| Sign up | Log in | Forgot Password |
This Thursday, Philadelphia's City Councilmembers will have the opportunity to pass real "Pay to Play" reform for our city. Councilman Michael Nutter's legislation would expose sweetheart deals to the sunshine of public scrutiny.
Unless they hear from you, I'm afraid they're going to blow it. Eleven Councilmembers are in favor of Nutter's legislation, one short of passage.
Mayor John Street has indicated repeatedly that our City has no money to spare. Over the past year and a half, the Mayor has told us that balancing the City's budget required the following:
If we can't afford these things, can we afford "pay to play?"
"Pay to Play" costs our City dearly. Last year $2 billion of the City's $3.4 billion budget went to no-competition contracts--about 2 out of every 3 dollars. These contracts are not awarded to the person who will do the best job at the least cost to the public, but based on other criteria.
At a $1,000 a plate fundraising dinner, the Mayor suggested what those criteria might be: "...if you support me, you're going to get rewarded..."
Councilman Nutter's legislation doesn't forbid the no-competition contracts. Rather his legislation attempts to cut the green ribbon that ties campaign donors to City contracts:
Sometimes even the best leaders need to be encouraged to do the right thing. Our government should not be for sale to the highest bidder. "Pay to Play" has got to go.
Thank you for considering my request.
| District | Councilmember | Supports Reform |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Jannie Blackwell | no |
| 5 | Darrell Clarke | no |
| 1 | Frank Dicicco | yes |
| At Large | Wilson Goode | yes |
| At Large | Jack Kelly | yes |
| At Large | James Kenney | yes |
| 6 | Joan Krajewski | no |
| 8 | Donna Miller | no |
| None | Michael A. Nutter | yes |
| 10 | Brian O'Neill | yes |
| At Large | Blondell Reynolds Brown | yes |
| At Large | Frank Rizzo | yes |
| 9 | Marian Tasco | no |
| 2 | Anna Verna | yes |